Air India 171 – LOGICAL To Blame Pilot?
The prelim report on the Air India 171 crash, deliberately or not, has left the finger pointing at the pilots. In this article I want to explore if blaming the pilots is logical given the information and statistics available.
Recap
A quick recap of the prelim report of Air India 171.
-Conversation in the cabin with one pilot asking the other if they cutoff.
-Data recorder says fuel control switches were put to cutoff 4 seconds after takeoff.
With this information the world seems to be leaning towards blaming the pilots but is this logical? Is this the most likely situation?
What Are We Saying?
When we blame the pilots what exactly are we saying?
I think it’s fair to say we are saying the following
Statistically speaking, pilots on airliners are more likely to crash the plane than a plane has a technical issue that causes plane to crash.
But is this correct?
How Many?
How many incidents are there of a commercial flight being brought down by a suicidal pilot?
And how many incidents are there of a plane encountering a software issue that brings down a plane?
ChatGPT
Asking ChatGPT we get the following for pilots deliberately crashing plane.
ChatGPT
Year Flight Location Fatalities Status 2013 LAM Mozambique TM‑470 Namibia/Angola ~33 Confirmed 2015 Germanwings 9525 French Alps 150 Confirmed 2022 China Eastern 5735 China ~132 (est.) Strongly Suspected
And for planes with software issues directly causing crash, ChatGPT says this
Flight Year Fatal? Cause
Lion Air Flight 610 (737 MAX) 2018 Yes MCAS software triggered by erroneous AoA
Ethiopian Flight 302 (737 MAX) 2019 Yes Same system/software failure ChatGPT
Qantas Flight 72 (A330) 2008 No Software design + hardware anomaly
And if we ask ChatGPT how many software issues have led indirectly to fatal or serious incidents we get this
ChatGPT
Incident Year Fatal Crash? Software Role Human or Hardware Primary Cause Air France 447 2009 Yes Misleading display behavior Pilot confusion after automation change Asiana Airlines 214 2013 Yes (fatal injuries) Complexity of automation modes Pilot mode/manual mismanagement Sriwijaya Air 182 2021 Yes Autothrottle malfunction Hardware/software interface issue TUI 737 near-runway disaster 2024 No Autothrottle glitch Software failure
Analysis
So in the last twenty years we have two confirmed crashes caused by suicide. And one suspicious.
And with regards to software malfunction we have two confirmed crashes caused by software & three crashes caused by software behaving in unexpected way (software not directly the cause) and two near crashes.
| Number of Flights | Crash Primary Cause | Secondary Cause Crash | Non Crashes | Total |
| Software | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| Human | 2/3 | 2/3 |
Conclusion – Air India 171, Pilots vs Software
Looking at this data it would seem twice as likely that Air India 171 encountered a software issue versus a pilot suicide.
People are saying that systems have backups and the chances of anything going wrong are almost inconceivable.
And this is correct.
But the data also tells us that the chances of a plane being crashed by a suicidal pilot is even less.
So I ask again, is it more logical to state “it must have been a pilot” rather than saying “it must have been a software glitch”?
If we are going to jump to a conclusion, which conclusion is the most logical to jump to?



