StrikeEngine

Car Videos – Calculators – News – Parts – Directory – Insurance

Air India 171 – LOGICAL To Blame Pilot?

Do the stats say it is more likely a pilot mistake than software? Lets take a look #airindia171 #airindiacrash
Air India 171 RAT deployment

The prelim report on the Air India 171 crash, deliberately or not, has left the finger pointing at the pilots. In this article I want to explore if blaming the pilots is logical given the information and statistics available.

Recap

A quick recap of the prelim report of Air India 171.

-Conversation in the cabin with one pilot asking the other if they cutoff.

-Data recorder says fuel control switches were put to cutoff 4 seconds after takeoff.

With this information the world seems to be leaning towards blaming the pilots but is this logical? Is this the most likely situation?

This article in video

What Are We Saying?

When we blame the pilots what exactly are we saying?

I think it’s fair to say we are saying the following

Statistically speaking, pilots on airliners are more likely to crash the plane than a plane has a technical issue that causes plane to crash.

But is this correct?

How Many?

How many incidents are there of a commercial flight being brought down by a suicidal pilot?

And how many incidents are there of a plane encountering a software issue that brings down a plane?

ChatGPT

Asking ChatGPT we get the following for pilots deliberately crashing plane.

YearFlightLocationFatalitiesStatus
2013LAM Mozambique TM‑470Namibia/Angola~33Confirmed
2015Germanwings 9525French Alps150Confirmed
2022China Eastern 5735China~132 (est.)Strongly Suspected
ChatGPT

And for planes with software issues directly causing crash, ChatGPT says this

FlightYearFatal?Cause
Lion Air Flight 610 (737 MAX)2018YesMCAS software triggered by erroneous AoA
Ethiopian Flight 302 (737 MAX)2019YesSame system/software failure
Qantas Flight 72 (A330)2008NoSoftware design + hardware anomaly
ChatGPT

And if we ask ChatGPT how many software issues have led indirectly to fatal or serious incidents we get this

IncidentYearFatal Crash?Software RoleHuman or Hardware Primary Cause
Air France 4472009YesMisleading display behaviorPilot confusion after automation change
Asiana Airlines 2142013Yes (fatal injuries)Complexity of automation modesPilot mode/manual mismanagement
Sriwijaya Air 1822021YesAutothrottle malfunctionHardware/software interface issue
TUI 737 near-runway disaster2024NoAutothrottle glitchSoftware failure
ChatGPT

Analysis

So in the last twenty years we have two confirmed crashes caused by suicide. And one suspicious.

And with regards to software malfunction we have two confirmed crashes caused by software & three crashes caused by software behaving in unexpected way (software not directly the cause) and two near crashes.

Number of FlightsCrash Primary CauseSecondary Cause CrashNon CrashesTotal
Software2327
Human2/32/3
Number of Incidents by cause

Conclusion – Air India 171, Pilots vs Software

Looking at this data it would seem twice as likely that Air India 171 encountered a software issue versus a pilot suicide.

People are saying that systems have backups and the chances of anything going wrong are almost inconceivable.

And this is correct.

But the data also tells us that the chances of a plane being crashed by a suicidal pilot is even less.

So I ask again, is it more logical to state “it must have been a pilot” rather than saying “it must have been a software glitch”?

If we are going to jump to a conclusion, which conclusion is the most logical to jump to?

Explore StrikeEngine

Find performance parts on ebay




This page was last modified Jul 24, 2025 @ 12:13 pm

StrikeEngine TV Highlights

Comments:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 × five =



Get our news in your inbox - Subscribe

* indicates required